Executive Summary

Dividend investing often rewards familiarity. Over time, investors grow comfortable with companies they understand well and whose dividends arrive reliably. However, that familiarity can quietly turn into complacency—especially when operating conditions shift or valuations begin to assume more than the business can reasonably deliver.

This article examines three well-known dividend stocks—Thai Beverage, Sheng Siong, and Kimly—that remain fundamentally sound and continue to pay dividends, but where recent operating trends, cost dynamics, and market pricing suggest investors should be more selective when allocating new capital.

---

Why Dividend Stocks Rarely “Break” — But Can Still Disappoint

Unlike growth stocks, dividend stocks are seldom punished by sudden collapses. More often, returns erode gradually. Costs rise, growth moderates, and dividend sustainability becomes more constrained—not because the business fails, but because expectations drift too far ahead of fundamentals.

For dividend investors, the more relevant question is often not whether a company is good, but whether it still offers an attractive risk-reward profile today, at current valuations and operating momentum.

---

Thai Beverage: Cost Relief Is Not the Same as Earnings Recovery

Thai Beverage (Y92.SI) is frequently viewed as a straightforward consumption story, but in practice it operates as a diversified regional consumer platform. Its four main segments—Spirits, Beer, Non-Alcoholic Beverages, and Food—provide breadth, but profitability remains heavily concentrated in Spirits, which contributes the bulk of group earnings.

For FY2025, Thai Beverage reported revenue of approximately THB333 billion, down around 2% year-on-year. Profit attributable to shareholders declined by close to 7% to about THB25.4 billion. These figures do not indicate distress, but they do signal a softening demand environment.

At first glance, margin trends appear encouraging. Raw material costs eased, and cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue improved. However, this relief was largely offset by higher operating expenses, particularly marketing and promotional spending, as the company worked to defend volumes—especially within the Spirits segment.

This is a critical point. Spirits volumes declined by low single digits during the year, and because Spirits is the primary earnings driver, volume softness here has an outsized impact. Management’s response has been to increase brand investment and premiumisation efforts, which makes strategic sense but raises near-term cost intensity with no guarantee of rapid volume recovery.

While Beer and non-alcoholic beverages provided some resilience, they are not yet large enough to fully offset softness in Spirits. As a result, the earnings engine is working harder for each incremental unit of profit.

From a dividend perspective, Thai Beverage maintained its full-year dividend at THB0.62 per share, with the payout ratio rising to just over 60%. This reflects management’s commitment to dividend stability, but it also highlights that future dividend growth is now more tightly linked to earnings recovery.

At current valuations, the stock appears inexpensive relative to its history. However, that discount reflects investor caution, not neglect. The market is waiting for clearer evidence that consumption growth can reaccelerate without structurally higher selling costs.

Implication: Thai Beverage remains a high-quality consumer franchise, but the investment narrative has shifted. This is no longer a simple margin recovery story, and dividend stability does not automatically imply near-term upside.

---

Sheng Siong: A Strong Business Priced for Perfection

Sheng Siong (OV8.SI) is widely regarded as one of Singapore’s best-run supermarket operators. Its heartland store network, focus on daily necessities, and disciplined execution make it a naturally defensive business.

Operational performance remains solid. In the first half of FY2025, revenue grew by just over 7%, supported by higher footfall and store expansion. However, profit growth lagged at around 3%, despite some improvement in gross margins.

This divergence is telling. As Sheng Siong expands, revenue scales, but so do costs. Selling and distribution expenses—including labour, utilities, and depreciation—have risen at a similar or faster pace than revenue. This reflects the reality that supermarkets in Singapore operate in a structurally high-cost environment, where operating leverage is limited.

Despite this, market enthusiasm has been strong. Sheng Siong’s share price has risen more than 60% year-to-date, pushing valuation multiples into the mid-20s earnings range—well above both the broader market and its own historical norms.

At these levels, the question is no longer whether Sheng Siong is a good business—it clearly is—but whether it can continue to exceed expectations when expectations are already high. Any moderation in same-store sales growth, slower outlet expansion, or margin pressure would not undermine the business, but could still disappoint investors.

Dividend yields have compressed as the share price has risen, meaning investors are paying more upfront for the same defensive characteristics they could previously access at lower valuations.

Implication: Sheng Siong remains a quality defensive holding, but at current prices it is priced for strong execution with limited margin for error. For existing shareholders, it remains a comfortable hold. For new investors, patience may offer a better entry point.

---

Kimly: Stable Cash Flows in a Structurally Tight Margin Business

Kimly (1D0.SI) operates one of Singapore’s largest networks of traditional coffee shops, alongside food courts, industrial canteens, and a growing food retail segment. Its outlets are embedded within residential estates, providing a defensive and predictable revenue base.

For FY2025, Kimly reported revenue of approximately S$322 million, largely flat year-on-year, while net profit edged up to around S$33 million. The company generated strong operating cash flow, ended the year with more than S$68 million in cash, and paid a total dividend of 2 cents per share, representing a payout ratio of nearly 75%.

The challenge for Kimly is not financial strength, but growth. Over the past three years, revenue has effectively plateaued. New outlets have offset closures and weaker contributions elsewhere, but they have not driven meaningful expansion. The food retail division even saw a decline in revenue in FY2025 amid rationalisation and competitive pressures.

Margins have improved modestly, with gross margins edging above 29%. However, around 70% of revenue still goes toward cost of sales, leaving limited room to absorb labour, utilities, rent, and maintenance costs—pressures that are structural rather than cyclical.

Kimly’s strategy of acquiring properties, investing in central kitchens, and expanding selectively improves long-term resilience but increases capital intensity. With a high payout ratio, financial flexibility is inherently more constrained.

Implication: Kimly is a dependable income stock, not a growth story. Its dividend appears sustainable in the near term, but long-term dividend growth is limited unless revenue growth or margins improve meaningfully—both difficult in Singapore’s mature F&B landscape.

---

Conclusion: When Dividend Discipline Means Waiting

Across all three companies, the common thread is not weakness, but sensitivity—sensitivity to cost pressures, valuation expectations, and the amount of growth already priced into the share price.

In one case, earnings are being defended through higher spending. In another, strong execution is being priced as if it will remain flawless. In the third, stable cash flows are doing much of the work in a structurally tight margin environment.

None of these factors automatically make these stocks poor investments. However, they do alter the risk-reward balance for dividend investors who value consistency, downside protection, and long-term compounding.

Sometimes, the most disciplined decision is not to buy or sell, but to pause—allowing expectations, prices, and fundamentals to realign.

---