Executive Summary

The Straits Times Index (STI) declined 8.8% between 30 September and 6 November 2026, led by weakness in Singapore’s major banks. However, the correction has been uneven across the broader market. Keppel and ST Engineering experienced substantially larger declines, while Singtel and Sembcorp Industries demonstrated relative resilience. The divergence reflects differences in starting valuations, earnings expectations, business fundamentals and financial risk.

An assessment of six STI constituents identifies Keppel (SGX: BN4), CapitaLand Investment (SGX: 9CI) and Singtel (SGX: Z74) as the more interesting valuation and income opportunities for further research. ST Engineering (SGX: S63) and Singapore Exchange (SGX: S68) remain relatively demanding despite their corrections, while Sembcorp’s (SGX: U96) apparently attractive valuation must be weighed against its enlarged balance sheet following the Alinta acquisition.

---

An Uneven Correction Across Singapore Equities

The STI declined from 5,675.88 points at end-September to 5,179.17 on 6 November, a price return of approximately -8.8%.

The three Singapore banks remain central to this movement, collectively representing more than half the index’s weight. In October, DBS and OCBC recorded combined institutional net outflows of approximately S$758 million, although UOB experienced a modest net inflow.

Beyond banking, the pattern was more differentiated. Singapore’s technology index declined 17.3% in October, reflecting a reassessment of semiconductor and AI-related growth expectations. However, prominent decliners such as AEM, UMS and Frencken are not STI constituents.

Conversely, the Singapore REIT index declined only 1.4% during October, compared with the STI’s 5.2% total-return decline. This suggests that some interest-rate-sensitive businesses, having already undergone earlier corrections, were relatively more resilient.

The implication is that index-level weakness should not be interpreted as uniform deterioration in Singapore corporate fundamentals.

Six STI blue chips: Price performance

Company	30 Sep close	6 Nov close	Change
Keppel (BN4)	$11.28	$9.45	-16.2%
ST Engineering (S63)	$10.92	$9.26	-15.2%
Singapore Exchange (S68)	$22.61	$20.49	-9.4%
CapitaLand Investment (9CI)	$2.58	$2.36	-8.5%
Singtel (Z74)	$4.25	$4.09	-3.8%
Sembcorp Industries (U96)	$5.79	$5.68	-1.9%

Source: SGX and historical market prices. Returns exclude dividends. SGX’s decline includes the ex-dividend adjustment for 24 cents of distributions on 30 October; including those entitlements reduces its approximate return decline to 8.3%.

The key distinction is between a valuation correction, where investors reduce the multiple paid for future earnings, and a fundamental deterioration, where the earnings outlook itself weakens.

Valuation Compression: Keppel Versus ST Engineering and SGX

Keppel: A deeper correction despite improving core operations

Keppel has experienced the largest correction among the six companies, declining 16.2% since end-September.

Yet its transformed core businesses reported more than 20% year-on-year net profit growth over the first nine months of 2026. Recurring income increased more than 10%, while asset-management fees rose 18% to S$354 million.

This operating progress contrasts with a 40% decline in overall nine-month net profit, primarily reflecting losses and charges associated with its remaining non-core assets.

Capital recycling provides a potential bridge between these two developments. Keppel announced approximately S$3.7 billion of asset monetisation transactions, although only around S$940 million had been completed and realised under the company’s transaction-accounting definition, which includes debt deconsolidation.

The investment proposition has therefore improved on price, but realisation risk remains. Further evidence of completed asset disposals, stronger recurring earnings and productive capital redeployment would support a more durable valuation reassessment.

ST Engineering and SGX: Strong businesses, substantial expectations

ST Engineering presents a different valuation challenge.

Its first-half revenue increased 11% to S$6.57 billion, while net profit grew 27% to S$512 million. New contracts secured in the first nine months reached S$13.2 billion, supported by demand across aerospace, defence and urban solutions.

However, even after a 15.2% share-price decline, its indicative forward P/E remains around 25 times. The company’s 18-cent annual base dividend represents a yield of approximately 1.9%, before potential profit-linked increments.

Consequently, investment returns remain substantially dependent on future earnings growth justifying a premium valuation.

Singapore Exchange displays similar valuation tension. FY2026 adjusted net profit increased 24.6% to S$759.5 million, with adjusted earnings per share of 71 cents. At S$20.49, the shares trade at approximately 28.9 times adjusted historical earnings.

The ordinary FY2026 dividend of 44.5 cents represents a yield of 2.2%, excluding a one-off additional 12.5-cent distribution.

Both companies possess established competitive strengths, but their corrections have not removed the need for sustained earnings delivery.

Income and Asset Management: CapitaLand Investment and Singtel

CapitaLand Investment: Improving fee economics and an attractive income base

CapitaLand Investment’s nine-month fee-related revenue increased 15% year-on-year to S$1.035 billion. Listed and private fund-management revenue rose 30% and 32%, respectively.

This supports its transition towards a more capital-efficient, fee-oriented business model.

However, total revenue declined 3%, partly because revenue from its real estate investment business fell 23% following divestments and deconsolidation. Moreover, part of fund-management revenue growth came from event-driven fees, which are less predictable than recurring management fees.

The company’s 12-cent annual ordinary cash dividend has remained unchanged for several years. Nevertheless, at S$2.36, it provides a historical cash yield of approximately 5.1%.

The combination of growing fee-related activities and an established income base makes CapitaLand Investment increasingly interesting. The principal catalyst would be greater conversion of fee growth into recurring profit, free cash flow and ultimately stronger ordinary dividends.

Singtel: A valuation adjustment that preceded October

Singtel declined just 3.8% during the comparison period, but its shares had already corrected substantially from earlier 2026 highs.

FY2026 underlying net profit grew 12%, while total dividends reached 18.5 cents per share, equivalent to a 4.5% historical yield at S$4.09.

However, the distribution comprises two different components:

• Core dividend: 13.4 cents, equivalent to approximately 3.3%.
• Value-realisation dividend: 5.1 cents, dependent on the group’s capital-recycling programme.

This distinction matters because capital-realisation distributions have different sustainability characteristics from earnings-supported core dividends.

Singtel’s appeal rests on its adjusted valuation, recurring telecommunications earnings, regional associates and digital infrastructure exposure. Its income profile appears comparatively balanced, although additional distributions remain dependent on asset-recycling execution.

Sembcorp: Attractive Earnings Valuation, Higher Financial Risk

Sembcorp Industries declined only 1.9% over the period, demonstrating relative resilience despite weaker underlying first-half earnings.

Underlying net profit fell from S$491 million to S$369 million. However, management reported pro forma first-half profit of S$558 million, assuming Alinta Energy had been consolidated from 1 January.

The acquisition considerably expands Sembcorp’s earnings platform, but also introduces additional financing obligations and consolidated borrowings.

Its latest two cash distributions total 27 cents, implying a historical yield of approximately 4.8% at S$5.68.

The central consideration is therefore not simply earnings valuation or dividend yield. It is whether the enlarged group can generate sufficient free cash flow to service debt, finance ongoing investments and sustain shareholder distributions.

Until the post-acquisition financial profile becomes clearer, Sembcorp’s lower earnings multiple should be assessed alongside its increased financial commitments.

Relative Investment Assessment

The six companies illustrate three different sources of potential investment attractiveness: valuation compression, improvements in underlying earnings quality and sustainable income generation.

Research assessment	Companies	Principal rationale
More interesting	Keppel, CapitaLand Investment, Singtel	Improved valuation, growing fee-related businesses or more balanced income characteristics
Less compelling currently	ST Engineering, SGX, Sembcorp	Demanding earnings multiples or increased financial risk

Keppel stands out for the magnitude of its valuation reset relative to continued growth in transformed core operations. CapitaLand Investment offers growing asset-management exposure alongside a 5.1% historical cash yield, although dividend growth remains an important test. Singtel’s earlier correction and recurring income characteristics also support renewed interest.

ST Engineering and SGX remain comparatively expensive despite strong operating performance. Sembcorp’s financial commitments following Alinta warrant greater attention than its resilient share price alone might suggest.

These classifications describe current research attractiveness, not a ranking of overall business quality or individual investment suitability.

---

Key Risks & Mitigating Factors

• Valuation risk: Further multiple compression remains possible, particularly for ST Engineering and SGX. Strong order books, recurring exchange revenues and established market positions provide operational support but do not eliminate valuation sensitivity.
• Transformation and execution risk: Keppel and CapitaLand Investment depend on successful capital recycling and expansion of recurring earnings. Progress in asset disposals and fee income is encouraging, but cash conversion requires continued monitoring.
• Dividend sustainability: Singtel’s value-realisation distributions and CapitaLand Investment’s flat ordinary dividend record warrant differentiation from recurring income. Core earnings and cash-flow generation are more reliable indicators than headline yields.
• Financial risk: Sembcorp’s acquisition-related borrowings raise the importance of debt servicing and capital allocation. Alinta’s additional earnings provide a mitigating factor, subject to successful integration and cash conversion.

---

The Dividend Uncle Research View

The STI’s correction has improved starting valuations, but not uniformly across its constituents. The more relevant question is whether share-price declines have exceeded changes in sustainable earnings and cash-flow prospects.

Keppel is the leading candidate for further valuation research, while CapitaLand Investment and Singtel offer different combinations of income and business development potential. ST Engineering and SGX remain quality businesses with substantial valuation expectations, whereas Sembcorp’s enlarged financial obligations require closer scrutiny.

For long-term income investors, distinguishing valuation compression from fundamental deterioration—and dividend yield from dividend quality—remains more useful than attempting to predict the next index movement.

---